|
Mr Ashwini K Trehan MBBS, DRCOG, FRCOG, FRCS (Edin) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consultant Minimal Access Gynaecologist (with special interest in Endometriosis and Keyhole Surgery)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
MR TREHAN'S OUTCOME RESULTS (AUDITS)Different audits have been presented here: Audit 1 - This is an audit of Keyhole hysterectomy in detail. LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMIES Audit 2 - This is an audit of Keyhole major gynaecological surgery on other gynaecological conditions, excluding keyhole hysterectomy.
LAPAROSCOPIC [KEYHOLE] Audit 3 - This is an audit of Endometriosis surgery.
LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL PERITONEAL EXCISION AUDIT 1AUDIT SEPTEMBER 2000
LAPAROSCOPIC [KEYHOLE] ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMIES
LAVH +/- BSO +/- ADHESIOLYSIS +/-
ALL
OPERATIONS UNDERTAKEN TYPE OF OPERATION – TABLE NO 1
ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE ADHESIOLYSIS – Uterine, adnexal and bowel, omental adhesions ( flimsy and firm and thick). PERITONINAL EXCISION OF ENDOMETRIOSIS – Striping of peritoneum covering ovarian fossa, pouch of Douglas, utrosacral ligaments and utrovesicle fold ( stage I- IV) DRAINAGE/EXCISION OF BENIGN OVARIAN CYST SALPINGECTOMY for chronic tubal disease
USO –
UNILATERAL SALPINGO
OOPHORECTOMY Histology Table No - 2
OUTCOME COMPARISON OF 5 – 50 PATIENT SERIES – TABLE - 3
HOSPITAL STAY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patient No |
Total |
Total day stay |
Median day stay |
% patients with |
|
1 - 50 |
50 |
107 |
2 (range 2-3) |
- |
|
51 - 100 |
50 |
102 |
2 (range 2-3) |
- |
|
101 - 150 |
50 |
92 |
2 (range 1-6) |
28% |
|
151 - 200 |
50 |
58 |
1 (range 1-4) |
88% |
|
201 - 265 |
65 |
71 |
1 (range 1-2) |
91% |
Most [91%] of patients left hospital after overnight stay
|
TYPE OF COMPLICATION |
CASE NO. |
NO |
% |
|
Rash & gastroenteritis
requiring re-admission |
12 |
1 |
0.37 |
|
Only blood transfusion
(B.T) |
45, 70, 168, 186 |
4 |
1.50 |
|
Richters Hernia
requiring re-operation |
46 |
1 |
0.37 |
|
Secondary bleeding |
75, 92, 148 |
3 |
1.13 |
|
Conversion of TAH
requiring 2 units B.T |
119 |
1 |
0.37 |
|
Subrectus haematoma requiring re-operation and blood transfusion |
163 |
1 |
0.37 |
|
Sup wound inflammation
requiring antibiotic |
169 |
1 |
0.37 |
|
Total |
265 |
12 |
4.5% |
LAVH is low complication hysterectomy with 4.5% of patients suffering complications
None of the complications were major and all patients had full surgical recovery at 6 weeks post operative – except for a few patients who had granulation tissue
|
Case No |
Total patient |
Re-operation |
Readmission |
|
1 – 50 |
50 |
1 (2%) |
2 (4%) |
|
51 – 100 |
50 |
1 (2%) |
2 (4%) |
|
101 – 150 |
50 |
0 (0%) |
1 (2%) |
|
151 – 200 |
50 |
1(2%) |
0 (0%) |
|
200 - 265 |
65 |
0 (0%) |
0 (0%) |
|
Total |
265 |
3 (1.13%) |
5 (1.88%) |
|
Case No 12 |
Rash/gastroentritis Re-admitted 5th post op day – allergy to Lactulose Stay 2 days |
|
Case No 46 |
Richters hernia Re-admitted 9th post op day – re-operation |
|
Case No 75/92/148 |
Sec bleeding
Re-admitted 18th, 11th, 12th
post op day. |
MAJOR COMPLICATIONS OF LAVH – TABLE 5 –
III
(Major complications include injury to bowel,
urinary tract and major blood vessels)
|
Complications |
Garry & Phillip (1995)* |
AAGL survey (1997)** |
Mr Trehan |
|
Bowel |
0.66%* |
0.54%** |
0% |
|
Urinary Tract |
2.77%* |
1.46%** |
0% |
|
Injury to vessels |
1.63%* |
2.55%** |
0% |
|
Total |
5.06%* |
4.55%** |
0% |
RE-OPERATION AND CONVERSION TO LAPAROTOMY
|
Total |
3.70%* |
3.78%** |
(4 patients)1.50% |
* Garry R, Phillips G – “1995”
Gynaecological endoscopy 4: 77-9
** Hulka J F et al – 1997
J Am Assoc Gynaecol Laparoscop 4:167 – 171.
(AAGL American Association of Gynaecological laparoscopists).
COMPARISON OF OVERALL COMPLICATION RATES FOR HYSTERECTOMY
(rate per 100 women undergoing hysterectomy)
TABLE – 5 –IV
PUBLISHED COMPLICATION RATES
|
Type of hysterectomy |
Mr Trehan’s |
1995 |
1994 |
1993 |
1982 |
|
Total abdominal |
- |
|
47.08 |
47.06-7 |
42.81 |
|
Vaginal |
- |
|
|
15.05 |
24.51 |
|
Lap-ass vag |
4.5%* |
15.69 |
18.08 |
13.02-4 |
|
The complication rate for LAVH is less than for vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
* Minor Vaginal discharge & vault granulation tissue not included.
Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LET et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1982; 144: 841-8.
Reich H, De Carpio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Journal of Gynaecological Surgery 1989;5: 213-16
Reich H. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Surgical laparoscopy and Endoscopy 1992; 2: 85-8.
Reich H. McGlynn F, Sekel L. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynaecological Endoscopy 1993; 2: 59-63.
Raatz D. The vaginal hysterectomy. Gynaecological Endoscopy 1993; 2: 85-7.
Dwyer N, Hutton J, Stirrat G. Randomised controlled trial comparing endometrial resection with abdominal hysterectomy for the surgical treatment of menorrhagia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993; 100: 237-43.
Sculpher MJ, Bryan S, Dwyer N, Hutton J, Stirrat GM. An economic evaluationof transcervical endometrial resection vs. abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of menorrhagia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1993; 100: 244-52.
Hildebaugh D, O’Mara P, Conboy E. Clinical and financial analyses of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Journal of the American Association of Gynaecologic Laparoscopists 1994; 1: 357-64.
Garry R, Phillips G. How safe is the laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy? Gynaecological Endoscopy 1995; 4; 77-9.
CONCLUSION
Most [91%] of patients left hospital after overnight hospital stay.
LAVH is a low complication hysterectomy with 4.5% of patients suffering with complication. None of the complications were major.
No patients were re-admitted following overnight stay hysterectomy.
Overnight hospital stay hysterectomy is possible and is safe practice
AUDIT 2
AUDIT DECEMBER 2000
LAPAROSCOPIC [KEYHOLE]
MAJOR GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY
[EXCLUDING KEYHOLE HYSTERECTOMY]
336 CONSECUTIVE OPERATIONS
DEWSBURY DISTRICT HOSPITAL
HALIFAX ROAD
DEWSBURY
WEST YORKSHIRE
VENTROSUSPENSION
SALPINGECTOMY
ADHESIOLYSIS (Mild to severe)
OOPHORECTOMY
OVARIAN CYSTECTOMY
OVARIAN DRILLING
ECTOPIC PREGNANCY
SALPINGOSTOMY – TUBAL SURGERY
|
TOTAL NO OF PATIENTS OPERATED |
336 |
|
TOTAL NO OF DAYS STAY |
387 |
|
AVERAGE DAY STAY |
1.15 Days |
|
% OF PATIENTS STAYING OVERNIGHT IN 1999 |
88% |
|
% OF PATIENTS STAYING OVERNIGHT IN 2000 |
96% |
MAJOR GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY
EXCLUDING HYSTERECTOMY
|
TOTAL NUMBER OF CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS OPERATED |
336 |
|
|
SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS |
3 |
0.90% |
|
Details of complications |
|
|
|
Weeping wound following ventrosuspension |
2 |
|
|
Blood transfusion – 2 units (stage 4 endometriosis) |
1 |
|
|
ANAESTHETIC COMPLICATIONS |
2 |
0.60% |
|
Laryngeal spasm – Pulmonary oedema-haemoptesis, blood
transfusion |
|
|
|
RE-ADMISSION WITHIN 6 WEEKS (No surgical complication) |
5 |
1.5% |
|
(Reasons for re-admission- anxiety due to bleeding caused by early onset of menstruation and dysmenorrhoea following the surgery and/or constipation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONVERSION |
0 |
0% |
|
INJURY TO IMPORTANT ORGANS SUCH AS BOWEL, BLADDER, URETHRA & BLOOD VESSEL ETC |
0 |
0% |
|
LONG TERM PROBLEM DUE TO OPERATION |
0 |
0% |
|
RECOVERY FROM OPERATION WITHIN 2 – 4 WEEKS |
|
100% |
SUMMARY
AVERAGE HOSPITAL STAY
FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC MAJOR GYNAECOLOGICAL OPERATION IS
1.15 DAYS
96% OF THE PATIENTS DISCHARGED HOME AFTER OVERNIGHT HOSPITAL STAY FOLLOWING MAJOR GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY IN 2000
NO CONVERSION OR MAJOR COMPLICATIONS AMONG 336 OPERATIONS
CONCLUSION
KEYHOLE LAPAROSCOPIC MAJOR
GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY HAS VERY LOW COMPLICATION RATES AND IS VERY SAFE
IN EXPERIENCED HANDS
ENDOMETRIOSIS SURGERY AUDIT
ALL
OPERATIONS UNDERTAKEN
BY
MR A K TREHAN FRCOG FRCS [Edin]
CONSULTANT MINIMAL ACCESS GYNAECOLOGIST
AT
DEWSBURY AND DISTRICT HOSPITAL